<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1159 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386391</link>
    <description>The court issued a notice returnable on 27th September, 2019, in response to the petitioner&#039;s challenge against the seizure of their car under rule 139(2) of the Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The court acknowledged the lack of legal basis for the seizure, allowing for direct service on the same day. This prompt action indicates the court&#039;s readiness to review the legality and justification of the seizure, as argued by the petitioner&#039;s advocate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1159 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386391</link>
      <description>The court issued a notice returnable on 27th September, 2019, in response to the petitioner&#039;s challenge against the seizure of their car under rule 139(2) of the Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The court acknowledged the lack of legal basis for the seizure, allowing for direct service on the same day. This prompt action indicates the court&#039;s readiness to review the legality and justification of the seizure, as argued by the petitioner&#039;s advocate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>