<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19893</link>
    <description>Section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act could not be applied where the Tribunal found, on the evidence, that the transfer of the business to the assessee&#039;s wife was for adequate consideration. The Tribunal treated the consideration for goodwill and furniture as reasonable after considering the business&#039;s small profits, the need to allow remuneration to the proprietor, and the age and condition of the furniture. The High Court treated that conclusion as a factual finding, noted that all relevant circumstances had been considered, and declined to interfere. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19893</link>
      <description>Section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act could not be applied where the Tribunal found, on the evidence, that the transfer of the business to the assessee&#039;s wife was for adequate consideration. The Tribunal treated the consideration for goodwill and furniture as reasonable after considering the business&#039;s small profits, the need to allow remuneration to the proprietor, and the age and condition of the furniture. The High Court treated that conclusion as a factual finding, noted that all relevant circumstances had been considered, and declined to interfere. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>