<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1147 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386379</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta found that the objection raised by the appellant regarding the jurisdiction of a show cause notice lacked substance. The Court directed a fresh adjudication of the notice by the Service Audit Commissionerate, Kolkata, within three months, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard. The previous adjudication was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of by modifying the earlier judgement and order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1147 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386379</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta found that the objection raised by the appellant regarding the jurisdiction of a show cause notice lacked substance. The Court directed a fresh adjudication of the notice by the Service Audit Commissionerate, Kolkata, within three months, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard. The previous adjudication was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of by modifying the earlier judgement and order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>