<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1133 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the quantum addition of Rs. 8,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and the penalty under Section 271D. The Tribunal concluded that the addition based on draft agreements was unjustified due to lack of evidence supporting their execution, and found a reasonable cause for accepting cash loans in the urgent need to pay occupants to vacate a property, as shown in the cash book.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1133 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the quantum addition of Rs. 8,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and the penalty under Section 271D. The Tribunal concluded that the addition based on draft agreements was unjustified due to lack of evidence supporting their execution, and found a reasonable cause for accepting cash loans in the urgent need to pay occupants to vacate a property, as shown in the cash book.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>