<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19890</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law on whether the interest amount of Rs. 7,59,748 awarded by the arbitrator should be classified as a capital receipt, excluding the already taxed interest. The decision clarified the legal status of the interest amount under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19890</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law on whether the interest amount of Rs. 7,59,748 awarded by the arbitrator should be classified as a capital receipt, excluding the already taxed interest. The decision clarified the legal status of the interest amount under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>