<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1680 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283526</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the claim of the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL) was not barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the validity of the assignment deed and the settlement proposals offered by the Corporate Debtor. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:23:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1680 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283526</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the claim of the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL) was not barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the validity of the assignment deed and the settlement proposals offered by the Corporate Debtor. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>