<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283516</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court examined conflicting decisions and a criminal case under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, involving directors of a company. The Court found the summons against the directors erroneous as there was no indication of their involvement in the offense. Consequently, the Court set aside the summons, overturned the High Court judgment, and emphasized the importance of establishing director liability in company offense cases under the Act. The appeal was allowed with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283516</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court examined conflicting decisions and a criminal case under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, involving directors of a company. The Court found the summons against the directors erroneous as there was no indication of their involvement in the offense. Consequently, the Court set aside the summons, overturned the High Court judgment, and emphasized the importance of establishing director liability in company offense cases under the Act. The appeal was allowed with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>