<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1631 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283513</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that discrepancies in estimated and actual costs were due to changes in accounting methods and not concealment of income. The judgment stressed the significance of accounting practices in tax matters, leading to the dismissal of the tax appeal by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1631 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283513</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that discrepancies in estimated and actual costs were due to changes in accounting methods and not concealment of income. The judgment stressed the significance of accounting practices in tax matters, leading to the dismissal of the tax appeal by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>