<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1119 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386351</link>
    <description>The appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order was dismissed, affirming the classification of preoperative expenses as revenue expenditure for the assessee setting up new stores. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on prior SC and HC rulings established that book treatment is not decisive in tax proceedings, leading to the dismissal due to lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1119 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386351</link>
      <description>The appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order was dismissed, affirming the classification of preoperative expenses as revenue expenditure for the assessee setting up new stores. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on prior SC and HC rulings established that book treatment is not decisive in tax proceedings, leading to the dismissal due to lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>