https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386344 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the cross objections, affirming the Commissioner's order on the classification of imported goods under CTH 90011000 without the benefit of Notification No 24/2006-Cus. The demand of &8377;14,99,939 under Section 28(2) of CA 62 was confirmed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the inapplicability of Section 28(2B) for appropriation of voluntarily deposited amounts by the revenue. The decision was pronounced on 24.09.2019, settling the issues raised in the appeal and cross objections conclusively. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386344 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the cross objections, affirming the Commissioner's order on the classification of imported goods under CTH 90011000 without the benefit of Notification No 24/2006-Cus. The demand of &8377;14,99,939 under Section 28(2) of CA 62 was confirmed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the inapplicability of Section 28(2B) for appropriation of voluntarily deposited amounts by the revenue. The decision was pronounced on 24.09.2019, settling the issues raised in the appeal and cross objections conclusively. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386344