<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1108 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) and restored possession of the property to the appellants. It imposed a condition for the appellants to deposit Rs. 90 lakhs with the Respondent within two months, subject to modification if transactions were proven genuine. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1108 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) and restored possession of the property to the appellants. It imposed a condition for the appellants to deposit Rs. 90 lakhs with the Respondent within two months, subject to modification if transactions were proven genuine. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>