https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386336 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal before CESTAT and reaffirming the binding nature of the precedent set by Anjani Technoplast regarding the applicability of the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner was directed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement to proceed with their appeal. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386336 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal before CESTAT and reaffirming the binding nature of the precedent set by Anjani Technoplast regarding the applicability of the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner was directed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement to proceed with their appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386336