<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1101 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386333</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the bail petition, citing the petitioner&#039;s voluntary production of cocaine and the prima facie evidence of a commercial quantity. The court found no reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner was not guilty, denying bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court emphasized the need for the prosecution to prove the quantity during trial, despite some infraction in the quantitative analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1101 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386333</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the bail petition, citing the petitioner&#039;s voluntary production of cocaine and the prima facie evidence of a commercial quantity. The court found no reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner was not guilty, denying bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court emphasized the need for the prosecution to prove the quantity during trial, despite some infraction in the quantitative analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>