<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1534 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283501</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s interpretation of Section 35 ABB, which classified the expenditure as revenue rather than capital. The decision aligned with precedent, specifically the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd., reinforcing consistency in the treatment of similar expenditures across cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1534 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283501</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s interpretation of Section 35 ABB, which classified the expenditure as revenue rather than capital. The decision aligned with precedent, specifically the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd., reinforcing consistency in the treatment of similar expenditures across cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>