https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283503 The court held that the respondent was entitled to certified copies of evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act, as they are not exempt from disclosure. Despite a procedural lapse in not providing a hearing to recommended candidates, public interest favored disclosure. Evaluated answer sheets were deemed public documents, not third-party information, and not exempt under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act. The court dismissed the petition, instructing compliance with providing copies and ordering costs to be paid to the Bar Association. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:19:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283503 The court held that the respondent was entitled to certified copies of evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act, as they are not exempt from disclosure. Despite a procedural lapse in not providing a hearing to recommended candidates, public interest favored disclosure. Evaluated answer sheets were deemed public documents, not third-party information, and not exempt under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act. The court dismissed the petition, instructing compliance with providing copies and ordering costs to be paid to the Bar Association. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283503