<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1254 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283504</link>
    <description>Charges received for supply of industrial gases through pipeline were held to form part of the agreed sale price under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The definition of sale price was treated as materially similar to earlier authorities, and the governing principle applied was that an amount included in the price of the goods remains within sale price under the first limb of the definition. The separate exclusion for freight or delivery costs applies only to the inclusive limb and cannot remove amounts that are already part of the contractual price. On that interpretation, the facility charges were not excludible from sale price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1254 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283504</link>
      <description>Charges received for supply of industrial gases through pipeline were held to form part of the agreed sale price under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The definition of sale price was treated as materially similar to earlier authorities, and the governing principle applied was that an amount included in the price of the goods remains within sale price under the first limb of the definition. The separate exclusion for freight or delivery costs applies only to the inclusive limb and cannot remove amounts that are already part of the contractual price. On that interpretation, the facility charges were not excludible from sale price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>