<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19874</link>
    <description>The court held that once a draft order is issued by the Income-tax Officer under Section 144B, the assessee cannot submit a revised return. The petition challenging the refusal to accept the third revised return was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no costs awarded. The court emphasized that allowing revised returns after the draft order would disrupt the assessment process outlined in Section 144B, leading to delays and uncertainty in finalizing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19874</link>
      <description>The court held that once a draft order is issued by the Income-tax Officer under Section 144B, the assessee cannot submit a revised return. The petition challenging the refusal to accept the third revised return was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no costs awarded. The court emphasized that allowing revised returns after the draft order would disrupt the assessment process outlined in Section 144B, leading to delays and uncertainty in finalizing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>