https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386326 A Haryana VAT and CST assessee faced an additional assessment demand for alleged non-furnishing of trading accounts, balance sheet and C Forms. Its first appeal was rejected for failure to satisfy Section 33(5) of the HVAT Act, which treats furnishing of a security bond to the Assessing Authority's satisfaction as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeal; the Tribunal also declined relief. In the High Court appeal, the appellant noted that the vires of Section 33 could not be challenged in an appeal and sought permission to withdraw the matter to pursue a writ petition. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to do so. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:58:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386326 A Haryana VAT and CST assessee faced an additional assessment demand for alleged non-furnishing of trading accounts, balance sheet and C Forms. Its first appeal was rejected for failure to satisfy Section 33(5) of the HVAT Act, which treats furnishing of a security bond to the Assessing Authority's satisfaction as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeal; the Tribunal also declined relief. In the High Court appeal, the appellant noted that the vires of Section 33 could not be challenged in an appeal and sought permission to withdraw the matter to pursue a writ petition. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to do so. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386326