https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386318 The High Court remitted the case for fresh consideration as the Single Judge did not address all grounds raised by the appellant, including the challenge to penalty orders based on limitation under Section 67 of the KVAT Act and the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act. The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous judgment, and the writ petition was restored for reconsideration. An interim order for payment of a portion of the disputed amount was maintained until the final disposal of the writ petition. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386318 The High Court remitted the case for fresh consideration as the Single Judge did not address all grounds raised by the appellant, including the challenge to penalty orders based on limitation under Section 67 of the KVAT Act and the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act. The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous judgment, and the writ petition was restored for reconsideration. An interim order for payment of a portion of the disputed amount was maintained until the final disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386318