<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1085 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386317</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that the reassessment under Section 147 was invalid. The court agreed that the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion, as the original assessment had already considered the Technical Know-How Fee. The substantial question of law was resolved in favor of the Assessee, confirming that mere change of opinion does not justify reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1085 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386317</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that the reassessment under Section 147 was invalid. The court agreed that the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion, as the original assessment had already considered the Technical Know-How Fee. The substantial question of law was resolved in favor of the Assessee, confirming that mere change of opinion does not justify reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>