<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386313</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court set aside the order of the 3rd respondent dismissing an appeal due to defects, ruling that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by not allowing the appellant to address the noted issues. The court granted the petitioner the opportunity to resubmit the appeal after rectifying the defects within three weeks. Emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of addressing deficiencies, the court directed the appellate authority to consider the representation, schedule a hearing, and dispose of the appeal on its merits promptly if the resubmission is in order. The petitioner was also given the chance to rectify the deficiency related to the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund during the resubmission process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386313</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court set aside the order of the 3rd respondent dismissing an appeal due to defects, ruling that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by not allowing the appellant to address the noted issues. The court granted the petitioner the opportunity to resubmit the appeal after rectifying the defects within three weeks. Emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of addressing deficiencies, the court directed the appellate authority to consider the representation, schedule a hearing, and dispose of the appeal on its merits promptly if the resubmission is in order. The petitioner was also given the chance to rectify the deficiency related to the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund during the resubmission process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>