<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1064 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386296</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalty u/s.271(1)(c). The Tribunal ruled that mere disallowance of cash credit claims does not constitute furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Referencing prior SC precedent, the court found insufficient grounds to impose penalty, thereby dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1064 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386296</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalty u/s.271(1)(c). The Tribunal ruled that mere disallowance of cash credit claims does not constitute furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Referencing prior SC precedent, the court found insufficient grounds to impose penalty, thereby dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>