<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 85 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;disqualified for being chosen as&quot; was construed to cover the entire electoral process from nomination onward, so a disqualification existing on the nomination date attached at that stage. Subsequent payment of municipal tax arrears before the poll did not operate retrospectively to cure that disqualification for the election in question. The reference in section 13-D(g) to arrears &quot;to which section 166 applies&quot; was held to describe the nature of the dues, not to import the procedural requirement of a bill or demand notice under sections 166 and 168. The absence of such notice therefore did not prevent the disqualification from operating.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:14:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 85 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;disqualified for being chosen as&quot; was construed to cover the entire electoral process from nomination onward, so a disqualification existing on the nomination date attached at that stage. Subsequent payment of municipal tax arrears before the poll did not operate retrospectively to cure that disqualification for the election in question. The reference in section 13-D(g) to arrears &quot;to which section 166 applies&quot; was held to describe the nature of the dues, not to import the procedural requirement of a bill or demand notice under sections 166 and 168. The absence of such notice therefore did not prevent the disqualification from operating.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>