https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498 The court held that the appellant was disqualified for being chosen as a member of the Municipal Board on the day he filed his nomination due to arrears in municipal tax exceeding one year's demand. The appeal was dismissed with costs in favor of respondent 3, who contested the appeal. The judgment emphasized that disqualification under Clause (g) attaches at the time of nomination and that the requirements of Sections 166 and 168 do not negate the disqualification if the arrears existed at the time of nomination. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:14:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498 The court held that the appellant was disqualified for being chosen as a member of the Municipal Board on the day he filed his nomination due to arrears in municipal tax exceeding one year's demand. The appeal was dismissed with costs in favor of respondent 3, who contested the appeal. The judgment emphasized that disqualification under Clause (g) attaches at the time of nomination and that the requirements of Sections 166 and 168 do not negate the disqualification if the arrears existed at the time of nomination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283498