https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283496 To establish abetment of unauthorised business of procuring and supplying railway tickets, the prosecution had to prove intentional facilitation by independent evidence; the co-accused's statement and surrounding circumstances were insufficient to show culpable participation, so the charge failed. The common and imperfectly tailored questions under Section 313 CrPC were criticised, but the defect did not justify reversal because the acquittal was otherwise supported and the evidence admitted two views. The SC therefore left the acquittal undisturbed. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:28:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283496 To establish abetment of unauthorised business of procuring and supplying railway tickets, the prosecution had to prove intentional facilitation by independent evidence; the co-accused's statement and surrounding circumstances were insufficient to show culpable participation, so the charge failed. The common and imperfectly tailored questions under Section 313 CrPC were criticised, but the defect did not justify reversal because the acquittal was otherwise supported and the evidence admitted two views. The SC therefore left the acquittal undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283496