<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 732 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283491</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the genuine and bona fide nature of the transactions involving loans received in cash from family members. The decision underscores the significance of demonstrating the authenticity and reasonable cause behind transactions to prevent penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 732 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283491</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the genuine and bona fide nature of the transactions involving loans received in cash from family members. The decision underscores the significance of demonstrating the authenticity and reasonable cause behind transactions to prevent penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>