https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19863 The court upheld the Income-tax Officer's order adding Rs. 11,027 to the income of a Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1971-72, as the assessee admitted the error. In penalty proceedings, the court ruled that challenging the reassessment order was not permissible without fresh evidence of deliberate concealment, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue on both issues. The reference was disposed of without costs. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19863 The court upheld the Income-tax Officer's order adding Rs. 11,027 to the income of a Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1971-72, as the assessee admitted the error. In penalty proceedings, the court ruled that challenging the reassessment order was not permissible without fresh evidence of deliberate concealment, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue on both issues. The reference was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19863