<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386271</link>
    <description>The Court directed respondent No.2 to promptly forward the petitioner&#039;s representation for provisional release to respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 was instructed to decide on the representation within two weeks. The Court clarified that while the prayer was abridged, all contentions in the writ petition remained open, and no opinion was expressed on the case&#039;s merits. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386271</link>
      <description>The Court directed respondent No.2 to promptly forward the petitioner&#039;s representation for provisional release to respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 was instructed to decide on the representation within two weeks. The Court clarified that while the prayer was abridged, all contentions in the writ petition remained open, and no opinion was expressed on the case&#039;s merits. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>