<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1016 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386248</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of on the basis of the parties&#039; recorded consensus, with the respondents agreeing to keep the show cause notices in abeyance if the audit report is filed within the stated time. The operative effect is that the dispute was resolved through agreed terms rather than adjudication, and the notices were held in suspension subject to compliance with the filing condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1016 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386248</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of on the basis of the parties&#039; recorded consensus, with the respondents agreeing to keep the show cause notices in abeyance if the audit report is filed within the stated time. The operative effect is that the dispute was resolved through agreed terms rather than adjudication, and the notices were held in suspension subject to compliance with the filing condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>