<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 19 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19858</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred for issuing bonus shares was treated as capital in nature because it related to the company&#039;s permanent structure and conferred enduring capital advantage, so it was not deductible as revenue expenditure. A provision made on actuarial basis for future gratuity was also disallowed because deduction is available only when the statutory conditions are satisfied, and those preconditions were not met. On both issues, the questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 19 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19858</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred for issuing bonus shares was treated as capital in nature because it related to the company&#039;s permanent structure and conferred enduring capital advantage, so it was not deductible as revenue expenditure. A provision made on actuarial basis for future gratuity was also disallowed because deduction is available only when the statutory conditions are satisfied, and those preconditions were not met. On both issues, the questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>