<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Acquits Respondent Due to Lack of Documented Evidence in Charas Smuggling Case, Prosecution Fails Beyond Reasonable Doubt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49430</link>
    <description>Smuggling - Charas - secret information that respondent was carrying &#039;Charas&#039; and can be caught red handed but this secret information was not reduced into writing which is mandatory. - Basic principle of criminal jurisprudence is that prosecution has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt which has not been done in the present case. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:41:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Acquits Respondent Due to Lack of Documented Evidence in Charas Smuggling Case, Prosecution Fails Beyond Reasonable Doubt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49430</link>
      <description>Smuggling - Charas - secret information that respondent was carrying &#039;Charas&#039; and can be caught red handed but this secret information was not reduced into writing which is mandatory. - Basic principle of criminal jurisprudence is that prosecution has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt which has not been done in the present case. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>