<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19857</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, stating that Circular No. 30 of 1941 does not apply to her claim for setting off losses from an unregistered partnership against personal income. The court emphasized that Section 77(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, explicitly prohibits such set off, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow it. The judgment favored the Revenue, holding that the assessee cannot claim the set off based on the circular or any other grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19857</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, stating that Circular No. 30 of 1941 does not apply to her claim for setting off losses from an unregistered partnership against personal income. The court emphasized that Section 77(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, explicitly prohibits such set off, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow it. The judgment favored the Revenue, holding that the assessee cannot claim the set off based on the circular or any other grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>