https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386229 The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's substantial investment in a residential property but remanded the case to the Assessing Officer due to the absence of title deed proof for the flat, emphasizing the importance of providing complete documentation to support claims under the Income Tax Act, specifically disallowance of claim u/s 54. Legal precedents supported the appellant's entitlement to the deduction based on capital gain investment, highlighting the necessity of proving ownership through title deeds and related documents for claiming deductions. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:40:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386229 The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's substantial investment in a residential property but remanded the case to the Assessing Officer due to the absence of title deed proof for the flat, emphasizing the importance of providing complete documentation to support claims under the Income Tax Act, specifically disallowance of claim u/s 54. Legal precedents supported the appellant's entitlement to the deduction based on capital gain investment, highlighting the necessity of proving ownership through title deeds and related documents for claiming deductions. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386229