<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1529 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction over a possession claim involving alleged agricultural land may be barred by Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, but where the jurisdictional objection depends on disputed facts and no issue has been framed, the question should not be finally decided on the existing record. The proper course is to permit a limited amendment on the jurisdictional aspect, frame the issue, and remand the matter for evidence and findings under Order 41 Rule 25 CPC. The article states that the appeal was not decided on merits and was sent back for determination of the jurisdictional bar after evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1529 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction over a possession claim involving alleged agricultural land may be barred by Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, but where the jurisdictional objection depends on disputed facts and no issue has been framed, the question should not be finally decided on the existing record. The proper course is to permit a limited amendment on the jurisdictional aspect, frame the issue, and remand the matter for evidence and findings under Order 41 Rule 25 CPC. The article states that the appeal was not decided on merits and was sent back for determination of the jurisdictional bar after evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>