https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481 Civil court jurisdiction under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 requires factual determination where agricultural-land status and the statutory bar are disputed. Because no issue had been framed on the jurisdictional objection, the Trial Court must determine the applicability of the bar after allowing evidence. Amendment of the plaint was permitted only on the jurisdictional aspect, and the matter was remanded under Order 41 Rule 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure for findings. The appeal was not decided on the merits; the governing approach is to frame the jurisdictional issue and permit evidence where the statutory bar depends on disputed facts. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:36:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481 Civil court jurisdiction under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 requires factual determination where agricultural-land status and the statutory bar are disputed. Because no issue had been framed on the jurisdictional objection, the Trial Court must determine the applicability of the bar after allowing evidence. Amendment of the plaint was permitted only on the jurisdictional aspect, and the matter was remanded under Order 41 Rule 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure for findings. The appeal was not decided on the merits; the governing approach is to frame the jurisdictional issue and permit evidence where the statutory bar depends on disputed facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283481