<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1644 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that retention money can be taxed in the year of receipt, distinguishing it from performance bank guarantees. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that retention money should not be considered as income, emphasizing the importance of matching principles in accounting. The assessee&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2007-08 under section 143(3) was dismissed, with other grounds not pressed by the assessee also being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1644 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that retention money can be taxed in the year of receipt, distinguishing it from performance bank guarantees. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that retention money should not be considered as income, emphasizing the importance of matching principles in accounting. The assessee&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2007-08 under section 143(3) was dismissed, with other grounds not pressed by the assessee also being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>