<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19851</link>
    <description>The court held that the benefit of Rs. 3 lakhs accrued to the assessee and was taxable under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Tribunal erred in deleting this addition but was correct in deleting Rs. 1 lakh, partially applying the provision. Furthermore, the court clarified that the benefit derived by the assessee&#039;s relatives cannot be treated as a benefit derived by the assessee, citing relevant case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19851</link>
      <description>The court held that the benefit of Rs. 3 lakhs accrued to the assessee and was taxable under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Tribunal erred in deleting this addition but was correct in deleting Rs. 1 lakh, partially applying the provision. Furthermore, the court clarified that the benefit derived by the assessee&#039;s relatives cannot be treated as a benefit derived by the assessee, citing relevant case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>