<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1731 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to reconsider certain adjustments, including the risk adjustment, and upheld the exclusion of several companies from the final set of comparables due to functional dissimilarities and other relevant factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1731 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to reconsider certain adjustments, including the risk adjustment, and upheld the exclusion of several companies from the final set of comparables due to functional dissimilarities and other relevant factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>