<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 980 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386212</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a goods detention notice under relevant tax acts. The petitioner&#039;s goods were released upon providing a bank guarantee. The court directed the petitioner to pursue further remedies through adjudication proceedings and to follow the law by seeking remedies before the appropriate authority. No costs were imposed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 980 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386212</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a goods detention notice under relevant tax acts. The petitioner&#039;s goods were released upon providing a bank guarantee. The court directed the petitioner to pursue further remedies through adjudication proceedings and to follow the law by seeking remedies before the appropriate authority. No costs were imposed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>