https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386201 The Court disposed of the case concerning a private company's claim for a refund of the differential duty paid on imported goods after the Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of India assured that the refund application would be decided within the statutory period or by a specified date. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had accepted the declared value of the imported fabric consignments, and the petitioner's request for a direction to decide on the refund claim within a specific timeframe was met by the Revenue's commitment. The Court found the limited prayer addressed and concluded the matter accordingly. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386201 The Court disposed of the case concerning a private company's claim for a refund of the differential duty paid on imported goods after the Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of India assured that the refund application would be decided within the statutory period or by a specified date. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had accepted the declared value of the imported fabric consignments, and the petitioner's request for a direction to decide on the refund claim within a specific timeframe was met by the Revenue's commitment. The Court found the limited prayer addressed and concluded the matter accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386201