https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386189 An appeal before the Punjab and Haryana HC was treated as not maintainable because the admitted demand fell below the CBIC departmental monetary threshold for filing before that Court. On that basis, the appellant withdrew the appeal, and the Court dismissed it as withdrawn. The substantial questions of law raised were expressly left open for future adjudication, so the order addressed only maintainability under the pecuniary-limit instruction and did not decide the merits. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386189 An appeal before the Punjab and Haryana HC was treated as not maintainable because the admitted demand fell below the CBIC departmental monetary threshold for filing before that Court. On that basis, the appellant withdrew the appeal, and the Court dismissed it as withdrawn. The substantial questions of law raised were expressly left open for future adjudication, so the order addressed only maintainability under the pecuniary-limit instruction and did not decide the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386189