https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386184 Goods remained detained despite payment of the adjudicated sums and compliance with the earlier direction requiring release on receipt of the specified sums and bank guarantee. The court treated the continued detention as possible non-compliance with its prior order and required the concerned officers to explain why contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 should not be initiated. A notice to show cause against contempt was therefore issued in relation to the alleged failure to release the goods forthwith. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386184 Goods remained detained despite payment of the adjudicated sums and compliance with the earlier direction requiring release on receipt of the specified sums and bank guarantee. The court treated the continued detention as possible non-compliance with its prior order and required the concerned officers to explain why contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 should not be initiated. A notice to show cause against contempt was therefore issued in relation to the alleged failure to release the goods forthwith. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386184