<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1923 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283449</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai, found the Respondent/Complainant guilty of violating the moratorium order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by pursuing complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process. The Tribunal stayed the proceedings in the complaints, directing the withdrawal of the complaints to avoid further consequences for breaching the moratorium. The Respondent was warned of potential action if the complaints were not promptly withdrawn, with the Tribunal deeming the actions as a misuse of the legal process and suppression of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1923 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283449</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai, found the Respondent/Complainant guilty of violating the moratorium order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by pursuing complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process. The Tribunal stayed the proceedings in the complaints, directing the withdrawal of the complaints to avoid further consequences for breaching the moratorium. The Respondent was warned of potential action if the complaints were not promptly withdrawn, with the Tribunal deeming the actions as a misuse of the legal process and suppression of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>