https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283453 The Tribunal declined to interfere with an intervention application under section 60(5) due to the absence of an existing admission order. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to promptly decide on the pending section 7 application within three weeks after nine months of delay. Emphasizing timely resolution, the Tribunal instructed fair hearings for the Financial Creditor and Corporate Debtor, stressing due process. The judgment concluded by disposing of the appeal with specific directives to expedite the resolution process. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:59:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283453 The Tribunal declined to interfere with an intervention application under section 60(5) due to the absence of an existing admission order. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to promptly decide on the pending section 7 application within three weeks after nine months of delay. Emphasizing timely resolution, the Tribunal instructed fair hearings for the Financial Creditor and Corporate Debtor, stressing due process. The judgment concluded by disposing of the appeal with specific directives to expedite the resolution process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283453