https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283434 Medical facilities for retired High Court Judges raised competing views on the scope of statutory power and judicial parity. One view treated the State Government's power to extend additional facilities as discretionary, preventing a court from compelling notification of particular rules. The other treated medical facilities as a statutory condition of service connected with judicial independence, requiring uniform standards and parity between retired and sitting Judges where differential treatment is unreasonable. No final merits position was adopted because of the difference of opinion; the issue was placed before a larger Bench. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283434 Medical facilities for retired High Court Judges raised competing views on the scope of statutory power and judicial parity. One view treated the State Government's power to extend additional facilities as discretionary, preventing a court from compelling notification of particular rules. The other treated medical facilities as a statutory condition of service connected with judicial independence, requiring uniform standards and parity between retired and sitting Judges where differential treatment is unreasonable. No final merits position was adopted because of the difference of opinion; the issue was placed before a larger Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283434