<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all contested issues, including the legality of the CIT(A)&#039;s order, the acceptance of land valuation by the DVO, and the determination of fair market value of land. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction under section 54F of the Act, holding that the incomplete construction of the residential house did not disqualify the assessee from claiming the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all contested issues, including the legality of the CIT(A)&#039;s order, the acceptance of land valuation by the DVO, and the determination of fair market value of land. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction under section 54F of the Act, holding that the incomplete construction of the residential house did not disqualify the assessee from claiming the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>