<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19834</link>
    <description>The court held that the &quot;absence fee&quot; of Rs. 47,428 paid by the Indian company to the non-resident assessee-company was deemed income arising from a business connection in India and was taxable in the hands of the assessee-company. Additionally, the tax paid by the Indian company on behalf of the assessee was to be grossed up and included in the total income of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19834</link>
      <description>The court held that the &quot;absence fee&quot; of Rs. 47,428 paid by the Indian company to the non-resident assessee-company was deemed income arising from a business connection in India and was taxable in the hands of the assessee-company. Additionally, the tax paid by the Indian company on behalf of the assessee was to be grossed up and included in the total income of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>