<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 892 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386124</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the petition as the pre-existing dispute over an additional payment of Rs. 7,50,000 existed before the demand notice was issued, rendering it not maintainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The tribunal emphasized that the presence of a dispute prior to the demand notice precludes the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 892 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386124</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the petition as the pre-existing dispute over an additional payment of Rs. 7,50,000 existed before the demand notice was issued, rendering it not maintainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The tribunal emphasized that the presence of a dispute prior to the demand notice precludes the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>