<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 888 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386120</link>
    <description>The case involved two issues: 1) Availment of Cenvat credit on input services for employees&#039; personal use, and 2) Availment of Cenvat credit based on debit notes. The appellant, a Public Limited Company, availed credit on services like internet and insurance for employees&#039; personal use. The department sought recovery, alleging wrongful availing of credit. The Member ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that employees were service recipients and entitled to credit. Regarding the second issue, the appellant did not avail credit based on debit notes, contrary to the department&#039;s contention. The judgment favored the appellant, setting aside the demand and allowing the appeal with necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 888 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386120</link>
      <description>The case involved two issues: 1) Availment of Cenvat credit on input services for employees&#039; personal use, and 2) Availment of Cenvat credit based on debit notes. The appellant, a Public Limited Company, availed credit on services like internet and insurance for employees&#039; personal use. The department sought recovery, alleging wrongful availing of credit. The Member ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that employees were service recipients and entitled to credit. Regarding the second issue, the appellant did not avail credit based on debit notes, contrary to the department&#039;s contention. The judgment favored the appellant, setting aside the demand and allowing the appeal with necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>