<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 32 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19831</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of book results due to discrepancies and inconsistencies in accounting. It restored the yield estimate of cardamom made by the assessing authority, justifying the 1,508.750 kgs. estimate based on a found weekly report. The Tribunal validated the estimate using a piece of paper found in the ledger, presuming it to be reliable. Vehicle expenses and depreciation on an Ambassador car were disallowed as legal ownership was not with the firm. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were supported by valid reasons, and the revisions were dismissed without interference, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 32 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19831</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of book results due to discrepancies and inconsistencies in accounting. It restored the yield estimate of cardamom made by the assessing authority, justifying the 1,508.750 kgs. estimate based on a found weekly report. The Tribunal validated the estimate using a piece of paper found in the ledger, presuming it to be reliable. Vehicle expenses and depreciation on an Ambassador car were disallowed as legal ownership was not with the firm. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were supported by valid reasons, and the revisions were dismissed without interference, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>