<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1890 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the CIT (A) to decide the preliminary grounds afresh, stressing the necessity of a live connection between the reasons for reopening and the additions made. The appeal was partly allowed, and the matter was sent back to the CIT (A) for fresh consideration, with remaining grounds left unadjudicated pending the outcome of the preliminary grounds analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1890 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the CIT (A) to decide the preliminary grounds afresh, stressing the necessity of a live connection between the reasons for reopening and the additions made. The appeal was partly allowed, and the matter was sent back to the CIT (A) for fresh consideration, with remaining grounds left unadjudicated pending the outcome of the preliminary grounds analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>