<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1849 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283420</link>
    <description>Conditional permission for a medical college remains contingent on continued compliance with statutory and regulatory standards, including infrastructure, faculty, clinical facilities and hospital support. An inspection conducted around Christmas and New Year was not invalid merely because of timing, since the regulations only restrict inspections immediately around declared festival holidays and permit surprise inspection to verify genuine availability of facilities. Judicial review will not reappreciate the merits where the administrative order is reasoned and reflects application of mind to inspection reports and institutional history. The refusal of permission for the 2017-2018 academic session was upheld, while existing students were protected and a fresh inspection and reconsideration were directed for the next year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1849 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283420</link>
      <description>Conditional permission for a medical college remains contingent on continued compliance with statutory and regulatory standards, including infrastructure, faculty, clinical facilities and hospital support. An inspection conducted around Christmas and New Year was not invalid merely because of timing, since the regulations only restrict inspections immediately around declared festival holidays and permit surprise inspection to verify genuine availability of facilities. Judicial review will not reappreciate the merits where the administrative order is reasoned and reflects application of mind to inspection reports and institutional history. The refusal of permission for the 2017-2018 academic session was upheld, while existing students were protected and a fresh inspection and reconsideration were directed for the next year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>